One of the players in KN’s just-started Nordlond campaign –  Forumite, Discordian and infrequent guest poster Kalzazz – wanted to play a character from “Totally Not England.” As it turns out, such a place exists. It is called Brionnu, just south of Nordlond, along the eastern coast. There’s another realm/raiding target called Arnulf as well. “Totally Not England” is strongly Celtic in nature. It’s organized in what are best called Parrishes, with a local priest or druid (lots of druids) communing with nature and the gods, and acting as chief and first citizen. The parrishes are not terribly large, which means raiding one won’t get you in trouble with an entire country…just maybe a few thousand folks.

Hey, Vikings gotta Viking.

In any case here’s the first session, which I reported in A Pair of Wizards, as told from his point of view.

We were starting level, we were on a boat, then we fought bandits and crushed them.

Starting on a boat was a nice touch reminding me of Shining Force CD, and bandits of course are the popular starting foes of untold Fire Emblem games (Fire Emblem Gaiden even gives you Bandits on a Boat!).  I was really hopeful we would get to fight Dire Conches though like in Shining Force, some author needs to make those happen.

The fight . . . well.  It was definitely a low level GURPS fight.  Natalie started off auspiciously with a good axe throw, then not so well with a shield rush, so she didn’t get to use her cool boarfolk power.  She fortunately did not actually fall off the boat (though I would have felt that pretty appropriate!).  

I had promised to get hurt so healing could happen, and I was successful on that end.

The topic of contention is to sell the boat or keep it, with the delta about 3.5k either way, so that isn’t enough for any cool magic items I have no strong feelings on the matter.

I did start Natalie with a katana (sorry, a Brionese Sicklesword, the whole D&D idea of druids can use scimitars since are sickle shaped, well, Brionu is Celtic so Druid Land so I’m sure they like katanas!) because reach 2 cutting seems fabulous and they may be hard to get later.   So no quick release backpack or armor.   Getting armor and probably hobnails are in my future.

I’m probably going to spend the 3 CP I just got on Lifting ST, so my armor doesn’t send me careening wildly into the depths of encumbrance.   Encumbrance is very very real even for ST 19 barbarians.

I usually think of low level to high level characters in terms of low level characters are those whose biggest challenge is overcoming their own incompetence that gradually morph into being challenged by the coolness of the opposition.   We really weren’t challenged this session, but it still felt pretty low level.  I haven’t played a barbarian before but I think it is a pretty slow burn template unlike knights, swashes or wizards who can really roll from the get go, so I am hoping this campaign goes long enough to be being burning brightly.   The fact we had 30 seconds before the enemy arrived and the enemy did not simply die in a hail of ranged attacks in 5 of those 30 seconds also felt pretty low end, only Chuff (with a sling) and the Elfard Wizard (whose name I dare not try to spell, whats up with Elf Wizards with challenging names?  Seep in DFW has a Special Character in her name!) had the only ranged attacks that actually had ammo.   

The burning question now is in the realm of the Encumbrance and Liquidity constrained, is it better to get overall wimpy armor, or better to have less wimpy armor but more gaps in coverage?

And on the less wimpy but gaps in coverage plan, what do you armor?   Torso (or even front torso) since it is easiest to hit, or hands, feet and skull since weakest points?

An enemy All Out Attack next to me, and of course, my instinct was ‘Telegraphic to the Skull!’, but no Telegraphic in DFRPG.  That is huge.   That really was my crowning moment of feeling like a low level no account starting character scrub . . . . when an Enemy All Out Attack and it had zero input on my action next round, because not enough skill to target the skull, and neck at 11 or less . . . . so I just threw the same generic body blow I would have anyway.

This brought up the other burning question – what option makes the biggest change?  Telegraphic, Committed/Defensive, Evaluate?  (thats a trick question, I am sure it is not Evaluate).   Telegraphic is the Universal Response to All Out Attacks when it exists . . . without it they may be more worth doing, at least against the skill constrained.   What option changes the game the most?  I would be interested to see that discusssed.

Who knows!  Looking forward to next session!  And I really liked the cool map and boats.

Special thanks to Bruno for being general awesome and the reason I wanted to play DFRPG to begin with (and making a fabulous character art for me), Zul for running this (and the super awesome DOA that preceded it), and DHC to creating Nordlond.

With all the excitement about he DF Boxed Set, and even with my interview, there’s a lot of information +Sean Punch has put out there in the DF threat of the SJG Forums.

I’ve collected it here into one post. Hopefully it’ll help someone.

What is the DF Boxed Set

What This Is: A standalone roleplaying game, Powered by GURPS – a game created using GURPS as a toolkit. To create it, I had to rewrite big chunks of the GURPS Basic Set, GURPS Dungeon Fantasy (mostly the first three volumes), and – have no fear – GURPS Magic. I also had to write more original material than I realized back in January . . . Whether you’re a GURPS fan, a player of other RPGs, or a total newbie to gaming, there’s something in the box for you.

What This Is Not: An “update” or a “repackaging” of anything. This is not “all the GURPS Dungeon Fantasy supplements and related Pyramid issues in one place for existing GURPS fans.” That would intimidate the living crud out of newbies, who we hope will buy the game! In fact, you don’t have to know what a “gurps” is to use this. (Depending on how many house rules you use, you might even be better off if you don’t!)

More on this in upcoming weeks . . . I’m still writing the Designer’s Notes articles.

How well does it mesh with the current DF line?

Well enough, but there will be adaptations needed. Those going from the box to the PDFs will get a wealth of extra stuff, but they’ll have to learn some annoying GURPS mechanics that I either pounded flat or swept under the carpet, and will notice that bards aren’t quite the same. Those going from the PDFs to the box will notice a lot of replication, but they’ll get some surprising new stuff and replacement rules for things that kind of suck in GURPS, and will notice that bards aren’t quite the same.

I’d say that (GURPS Fourth Edition + GURPS Dungeon Fantasy) and the box are more compatible than GURPS Fourth Edition and GURPS Third Edition, Revised. But the box is a bit like “GURPS 4.5, only for hack ‘n’ slash.”

Are bards not quite the same ?

Bards right now are spread thin over three areas of supernatural expertise (Bard-Song abilities, magic spells, and Enthrallment skills) and two Talents (Bardic Talent and Musical Ability); can use only three colleges of magic; and have so many points tied up in this situation that there’s nothing left if, say, you want to play a nonhuman. In the box, all of these situations will take a turn for the better.

Choices from other supplements (Low-Tech in this case)

Being a new game and not a GURPS supplement, the box has the luxury of picking one set of numbers and pretending the others don’t exist. It went with the GURPS Low-Tech numbers because they’re more recent, cover more sorts of armor over more body parts, and more obviously assemble into grab-and-go suits. This does mean armor costs a lot and, at lower DRs, weighs a lot for what you get. It also means that as you slide up the scale, armor becomes pretty efficient.

It bears pointing out, too, that between modifiers like fine and orichalcum, and the almost criminally cheap Lighten enchantment, those with money can have armor that approaches “stupidly light” if they want it. This is fantasy, where money is no object but heavy fighters traditionally clank until they finally get cool magic armor. It is not medieval Europe.

From reading the description and from reading various comments, it sounds as though the material in the boxed set will have some differences when contrasted with the current DF line.
Yes. For one thing, many newbie-scaring rules and concepts (e.g., enhancements, limitations, and techniques) aren’t there – though they’ll work as always if you opt to restore them. Almost everything else has had a touch of the editorial pen. Some content has simply been tweaked not to refer those things I left out, of course! However, other material has been clarified (e.g., countless spell descriptions), optimized for DF (still on the magic theme: spells conform with Wizardry Refined), adjusted to be less lame in DF (Outdoorsman . . .), or had game-slowing complexities removed. A very, very small number of things have been rewritten sufficiently that they might not feel like the GURPS you know; they might feel a little “GURPS 4.5.”

Will the profession templates be at different CP totals?

No. They are all at 250 points.

The starting power level supported by the stock character templates in the Dungeon Fantasy Roleplaying Game is 250 points. Is that high? Well, because power level is open-ended, “high” is relative. In GURPS Fourth Edition, starting characters in even very realistic genres have 150 points, so 250 points is higher than that . . . yet it’s in the middle of what the Basic Set calls “larger-than-life” (200-300 points), toward the bottom of what GURPS Supers calls “low-power” (200-400 points), and well below the 400-point starting level for GURPS Monster Hunters, which also about sword-swinging, magic-using heroes fighting monsters. I’d say that makes 250 points a “medium” starting power level.

Does the Dungeon Fantasy Roleplaying Game support other power levels? Not in its character templates, no – those assume 250 points. The box doesn’t offer ready-made 200-, 150-, 100-, or 50-point templates, nor does it offer level-ups in large chunks. It starts players off with heroes who can do something cool in practically any situation out of combat and on every turn in combat, and it encourages them to “level up” creatively in the areas they find fun, not in prepackaged ways. But if the GM wants to get away from templates, there’s the usual support for any power level desired. Everything has a point cost and there are pointers on how to keep people focused at power levels other than the default one.

Personally, I feel that starting characters will feel a lot like new heroes in modern computer and tabletop RPGs, and that because of this, 250 points will be seen as “low” by those who have never played GURPS. Only veterans of very old zero-to-hero games, and those who have played GURPS at a wide variety of power levels in many settings, will feel otherwise.

It is often difficult to afford both a racial template and a professional template.

I’ve taken pains to ensure that every profession can afford a nonhuman racial template, though one expensive racial template is still a reach for one professional template.

I want to teach new players how GURPS works, and I’ve found that 250 points can sometimes be overwhelming.

I’ve made a few changes to template presentation to help a bit with that.

Will the differences between the box set and the existing DF line be significant enough to warrant something like a “GURPS Update” PDF, to help existing DF players and curious box set players conform the box set to the line?

Reply hazy, ask again . . . someday. In the past, update documents came after the fact and were mostly the work of dedicated fans, though SJ Games laid them out and distributed them. Noting each change in a log slows down a project of this kind immensely. Game development is writing, and writing works best when you don’t stop at every section to make notes in another document. Thus, there’s no change log – and text rearrangements ensure that automated file comparison is unlikely to work. Any such thing would be an after-publication effort, probably by fans.

It’s important to realize that we see the Dungeon Fantasy Roleplaying Game as similar to the Discworld Roleplaying Game, the Hellboy Sourcebook and Roleplaying Game, and the Vorkosigan Saga Sourcebook and Roleplaying Game. It isn’t a GURPS supplement, so update, conversion, or bridging documents aren’t a priority.

All of which said, it’s extremely compatible with GURPS and most of the changes are organizational (e.g., “Let’s lower ST and add those points to the advantage budget, so a player who wants an agile warrior rather that a strong one can have that.”).

Could we get a list of changes between the boxed set and the original materials?  Just the highlights would do nicely.

Game development is writing and writing isn’t the same as, say, software development . . . pausing it to log changes is a time-consuming and hence costly luxury. I did not do that, so there is no official list of changes. If something felt “off” to me, I changed it and moved on. It’s possible that fans might eventually crowdsource such a list – and if they do, it’s conceivable (no promises!) that SJ Games might distribute that list semi-officially.

That said, I have written 3,750 words of Designer’s Notes articles. Keep an eye out for those, because they do highlight the biggest differences – though at the level of “lots of spells were changed for these reasons” rather than “here’s a list of spells that changed,” never mind “here are the changes to spells.” Spells are just one example. You could replace “spells” with “advantages” or “gear” or “combat options” or “modifiers.”

There are a lot of new players who are interested in something more serious and character driven than the DF ad copy implies.

This is true, but our goal in this specific case is to build a single (sub)genre game from our generic game system. As subgenres go, traditional hack ‘n’ slash fantasy has a surprising amount of game-mechanical overhead (tons of detail needed on spells, weapons, armor, combat, monsters, etc., plus detailed resource tracking). A deeper social dimension would mean adding social traits plus at least a rudimentary socio-economic framework in which those things would be relevant, with all that implies for arms control, sumptuary laws, cost of living, jobs, residences, retainers, etc. That would bring its own significant overhead. For the time being, then, we’re focusing on the first class of things.

Nothing says the Dungeon Fantasy Roleplaying Game has to stop there, of course. It does include significant noncombat abilities, even social skills. The question is one of developing their use in more story-oriented directions.

Phil Reed notes: If the Kickstarter project closes successfully, this is just the beginning.

How pitched to new players of GURPS is the writing?
Its bias toward new GURPS players is comparable to that of the Basic Set: It doesn’t assume you already play GURPS and it does take the time to explain basics such as “What is roleplaying?” and how dice-rolling works.
Will players be assumed to know how to play an RPG?
No, although I was realistic in that regard. Most people who come to roleplaying do so after hearing how it works from people who already do it. I’m not sure it has been a thing since the 1970s to just walk down Main Street, see a funky shop with colorful boxes in the window, buy cold, and try to figure out the game. So the pitch is slanted toward people who have at least heard of RPGs, if not played them.
How well will, say, a middle school student be able to understand the Dungeon Fantasy RPG?
Better than such a student would be able to understand the Basic Set, I think. There are zero switches and dials to adjust to get the genre you want – only traits and rules you’ll use in adventure fantasy are included. There’s significantly less on-the-fly math. Templates aren’t as dense and hard to read. The overall tone of the writing is lighter; GURPS strives to be informal, even conversational, but I’d like to believe I took it even further.
(Of course, a bad student with terrible grades in English and Mathematics won’t get very far with it!)
So, we can only hope to see a suplement covering this social issues in a distant future?
As Phil Reed said, “If the Kickstarter project closes successfully, this is just the beginning.” I can’t promise that additional coverage of social gaming would be a priority, but it is item #7 on my big list of “maybes,” which currently goes up to 16.
So… IF this project succeeds, we can hope similar “boxes” for other genres, like Space Opera and Supers, right? Can we look to have a full “4.5 Edition” (or even a 5th Edition) in a distant future?
Probably not, because one of the biggest problems GURPS is facing is a general lack of interest in generic RPGs. In a hypothetical future where other boxes exist for other genres (and we cannot promise that!), each one would run with one specific genre. Which means its “4.5” would be a genre-specific rules set slightly different from all the other “4.5s.” All would be built from Fourth Edition, so there would still be a universal game behind it all, but pulling them together wouldn’t be the best use of energy . . . it would use up resources that could give us quite a bit of other genre coverage to create a game that covers all genres and thus competes with those boxed sets.
But this is all extremely hypothetical right now, and if you quote that back at me in a year, I’ll claim The Devil hacked my account. 😉
Will you fold the new template layout into the main line (not just DF)?
Probably not. It’s pretty hard on space and production artists, so it’s something we can do for a fancy 
product that we can’t so easily do for dozens of PDFs a year. Also – and this is important – the Dungeon Fantasy Roleplaying Game and GURPS are relatives, not supplements for one another. Things in one aren’t supposed to wash back into the other . . .
Anyway, all this talk made me think… there will be differences in costs of the advantages and disadvantages?
Off hand, I don’t recall changing any costs. Of course, the day the box ships, somebody will call me on that! But in the interest of compatibility, I kept even weird costs that weren’t nice multiples of five. Lots of cases of Trait [15] being made into Trait (Modifier, -10%) [14] became Other Trait [14] so that the games would remain compatible at the mathematical level, even though some labels changed.
Ah, wait, I just recalled one cost change I made . . . for bards. That’s all I’m going to say. 😉
The pattern being assumed I think is a mirror of the 3E to 4E jump, where 3E went to Compendium because everything new was scattered all over, and then Compendium went to 4E in part because lessons learned weren’t able to be universally applied.
That case isn’t very comparable to the current one, though. The Third to Fourth case was “old edition of a generic game with lots of add-ons gets a compilation of add-ons, new edition of the same generic game assimilates those add-ons.” The GURPS vs. Dungeon Fantasy Roleplaying Game case is more “generic toolkit is used to build a new game, which is an example of how the toolkit works.” The former situation is “I had a lot of hardware everywhere in my shop, so I created a system for keeping track of it all last year, and this year I just rearranged the whole shop.” The latter is “I had a lot of hardware in my shop, so I built a house to keep my family and friends happy.”
Personally I’d be afraid of greater fragmentation by going with a bunch of different box sets, each with its own “4.5” that undermines the notion of the G and U in GURPS, without folding it back in somehow.
If the Dungeon Fantasy Roleplaying Game were actually GURPS, I think that would be a worry. But it isn’t! It’s another game based on GURPS. The universal system already exists but is more system than game . . . what’s missing are actual worked examples of games you can create using the system. Creating those doesn’t affect the system – even if some of them need tweaks. It’s like the guy in my hardware example going out and buying some extra parts for his house, because they weren’t in his shop: That doesn’t make his shop less useful, and it doesn’t mean he needs to start cluttering up his shop with yet more hardware he needed for one specific project.
I have seen so many indies RPGs that I thought that the situation was not so bad […] today I think we have more, even if sell less.
The thing is that if there are a million customers and they buy 10 games, one from each of 10 big companies, each company gets 100,000 customers. If there are 1,000 games, each game gets 1,000 customers. Perhaps 1,000 games generate more interest and grow the market to 2 million people, 2,000 per game. But if the big companies used to 100,000 customers built their methods around having at least 10,000 customers even for total failures, 2,000 is 1/5 of a total failure. And if too many of those big companies throw in the towel as a result, the hype they generate goes away . . . and that hype is what the small and indie stuff piggybacks on. Each big company that goes away might take 1/10 of those 2 million people with it.
That’s a gross simplification, but it illustrates how you can have more interest, more people, and more products, yet less success. Indie really only works if there are a few big fish around to buoy awareness and invest in growing the hobby. Indies don’t have the spare assets to burn on those goals.
Who’s the author of “I Smell a Rat”? Or is this being kept secret?

I am the author of all the books. There will be “additional material” credits, and of course there will be credits for artists, production staff, marketing personnel, and so on, but I am the one who developed all of the written content.
And as a bonus: I Smell a Rat is a very basic adventure with one quest-giver and a single, fairly linear level. It starts at an inn, like so many old-school adventures do. It involves killing giant rats for rewards, like countless other intro adventures in countless other RPGs, both tabletop and computerized. Its primary purposes are to show GMs how dungeons are mapped, stocked, and described, and to give players a chance to learn about combat, tricks, traps, and looting. Of course, there are ways it could be expanded to bigger, flashier things . . . and for all I know, some enterprising author will come along and do exactly that.
Quarter of a million words is no joke. Yikes.

I got to reuse a lot, but that was rarely verbatim. The real work was making sure it was start-to-finish 
consistent, with no pointers to nonexistent sections or external supplements, and with all rules tweaks propagated to even the darkest corners of the text. Whether you find setting up, stocking, and organizing a shop easier or harder than building a house is a matter of personal skills and tastes, but doing the latter isn’t easy work just because the former is hard work.
Will the revision to the magic system go beyond Wizardry Refined + readability?
The magic system in the Dungeon Fantasy Roleplaying Game is the one in GURPS Magic with these major changes:
  • I made everything in “Wizardry Refined” (Pyramid #3/60: Dungeon Fantasy III, pp. 4-14) standard, not optional, and left no clue that things were ever any different.
  • I added Protection from Evil and Sense Evil, from GURPS Dungeon Fantasy 11.
  • I removed all Enchantment and Technological spells. (Enchanted items are still part of the game, but enchantments aren’t described as spells for PCs to learn and cast.)
  • I removed spells no PC is ever likely to cast, like Resurrection. (Just as with Enchantment spells, the effects still exist, but they’re now “stuff to buy in town,” not “stuff to learn and cast.”)
  • I removed over-complex, fussy, and/or wordy spells. I’m looking at you, Divination and Linking Spells.
  • I gave spells that made the cut a once-over for game balance (e.g., Stench is no longer the ultimate death spell, and Bless now has clear terminal conditions), consistency (e.g., to resolve the Great Sunbolt Damage Type debate), clarity (e.g., what are the actual rules for Earthquake breaking stuff?), and length (e.g., Sunbolt again). I rewrote those found wanting as much as I felt was needed.
  • I reformatted spell write-ups slightly to accommodate differences in clerical, druidic, and wizardly prerequisites.
It’s still possible to break the game, but not by giving all your friends triple-DR essential armor and unending Bless spells, or by learning half the Healing college as a wizard and making the cleric feel redundant, or by bringing everybody else’s fun to a halt while you enchant stuff.
This is a pretty cool product, but frankly if I were to do Dungeon Fantasy again with my current gaming group, I’d use the Sorcerer template + the Saint lenses and tell people the Basic Set magic system is off-limits.
I didn’t dismiss that out of hand, but as compatibility with GURPS Dungeon Fantasy 1 and 2 was a design goal, and as we wanted to offer hundreds of spell selections, I went with standard magic in the end.
Yes, this does mean warriors with lots of attacks, fine weapons, Striking ST, Weapon Master, etc. are simply better at damage per second than casters, while casters excel at pre-combat buffing, in-combat support, and post-combat recovery. But given that casters with Magery 6 and big Energy Reserves can create 18d Explosive Fireball spells, recover fully, and walk around with 18d hand grenades, I don’t feel too sorry for them.
Did you clarify magic items so it’s clear when a given item is always on, when it requires casting, etc etc?
Just about every item is the kind that doesn’t involve casting anyway, but yes, I think I made that a lot clearer. Bear in mind that removing Enchantment spells included removing most Item blocks. Magical treasures exist, but they’re mostly things like always-on weapons and armor. Mostly.
No wands (of fireballs or otherwise)?
No wands for now, no. We have to leave something for the future. But that future will definitely go with charges, yes. I cannot imagine anybody really wanting to pay FP if there’s a wizard who can do that, but I can easily imagine somebody (even a wizard) wanting limited-use magical pew-pew.
Is it Basic Set, Low Tech or something new hit locations?
Nothing fancy with hit locations at all . . . you get the Basic Set approach. Breaking them down more than that gets excessive, especially since just about all monsters are too weird to need the distinctions added by later books (or even the ones in the Basic Set, really).
Are there any load outs?
No. While I respect Matt’s work on those, my feeling and experience is that most gamers prefer to customize their gear. In fact, I’ve never had a player be happy with pregenerated gear. One of the game’s selling propositions is that you can customize your gear, so filling pages and pages with non-custom loadouts would be an iffy use of space.
Do SM>0 monsters have clear hex grid shapes?
“Combat Writ Large” was used to translate SM into hex sizes, yes. As the Cardboard Heroes are TBD right now, I cannot comment on how the counters for specific monsters will be shaped. That’s getting away from the part of the project that I control, and into graphics and physical components.
Please remember with questions like these that we’re aiming the game as much at people who’ve never seen GURPS as at people who measure their GURPS in gigabytes and shelf-metres, so we have to walk a line between “enough stuff to sell the game” and “so much stuff that people freeze up.” As Phil Reed said, if this gets backed, we’ll follow up with more. For instance, magic items (like those fireball wands) are #2 on my big list of 16 things I’d like to do.
Did any of the SM clarifications make it into the combat rules?

SM to hexes and a clear statement that SM affects even melee? Yes. Incidental collisions? Only indirectly, in the sense that there’s a statement that a multi-hex creature passing through your hex can overrun you. Reach? Built into monster stats already. All the rest? Not really . . . the general approach here was to simplify.
Is there clarification on how an encounter starts? Like who detects whom first and when there is surprise (partial, obviously), and what the distance is.
Yes! There’s a Calm Before the Storm section of rules reminding the GM to set distance (this is left to fiat and room size, but the reminder is there) and determine footing, talking about adjudicating what the PCs were doing when combat broke out, and saying a lot about surprise attacks.
Was there also an effort made to cut / revise blatantly under-powered spells?
Tons of spells were cut, and spells that didn’t really do much were early targets for the axe.
Gauntness is a great example of a silly spell I left out. Wither Limb . . . I’m not sure by what measure it’s anything but overpowered, as most of the Q&A I get about it amounts do, “Wait, does this basically inflict permanent dismemberment no matter how many HP the target has? Yikes!” So it hasn’t changed much. YMMV, but in my games, withering the legs off targets with huge DR that nobody can penetrate, so that the monster is left there immobile, has always been a favorite tactic.
By virtue of having fewer disadvantages and spells, this game can be clearer. Wither Limb now causes “permanent crippling” and refers to the rules for that, those rules spell out that a crippled leg inflicts Lame (Missing Leg), and Lame (Missing Leg) is very clear on “you’ve lost a leg.” Don’t rely on the Basic Set’s terminology in your judgments of this game.
What about awesome dragons?
Comparisons to everything in GURPS aren’t a good measure of “awesome” here, because new gamers will be comparing only to PCs and the 80-some other monsters in the set. But . . . my dragons start at ST/HP 25 and around 3d damage, with flight, area-effect breath, and multiple attacks, and go up to ST/HP 50 and around 7d damage, with faster flight and even more attacks. They also have DR comparable to good metal armor (yes, even over the eyes), and are almost the only monsters to keep stupidly high HT so you can’t just knock them down to -HP and watch them die. Notes recommend adding Magery (up to 6), Energy Reserve (up to 50), and spells. Further notes add the option to tack on even more stuff: Extra Heads with even more attacks, Danger Sense to avoid surprise, Terror, etc. As written, ST isn’t even the most meaningful measurement of dragon power – that would probably be “casting multiple save-or-lose spells from a near-bottomless energy supply wile flying at a safe distance over a group stunned by Terror and burning from large-area fire breath nobody could dive far enough to avoid.”
Loin cloths are absolutely awesome and must be bought

That particular abuse was anticipated, don’t worry. There’s no separate neck, torso, vitals, or groin armor . . . too fussy. It’s all just “body.” Those hit locations do still exist, but now 9-11 is all “torso,” and “groin” is a high-value sub-target, like “vitals.” I’m not that easy to fool. 😉
About that dragon  . . .
It’s made up for this game. I wrote quite a bit of new content, but it’s so integrated into the game that I don’t think I could list it all. However, I definitely remember writing up the dragon de novo!
I want to point out that giving monsters hundreds of HP is seldom actually any fun in play.
Agreed. I kept HP in the 1-50 range for monsters. The notes on a couple let you super-size them to HP 100 or even 150, but that’s mostly for static, gooey things that serve more as obstacles to hack apart than as foes.
That said, don’t forget that a HT 15, HP 50 creature is likely to suck up 300 points of injury (from +HP to -5×HP), or 550 with Unkillable (from +HP to -10×HP), and that DR, Injury Tolerance, and Regeneration can make it hard to get a monster there. In GURPS or the Dungeon Fantasy Roleplaying Game, ST/HP isn’t by itself the best measure of toughness . . . I’d rather face ST/HP 50, HT 10, and no special powers than ST/HP 10, HT 16, Unkillable, and a 5d withering Malediction that ignores my armor.
Is this going to include psionics?
Definitely not. It isn’t going to include much GURPS Dungeon Fantasy content outside of GURPS 
Dungeon Fantasy 1 and 2, GURPS Dungeon Fantasy Monsters 1 and 2, and some nonhumans from GURPS Dungeon Fantasy 3. This means it omits most of the series and all of the Pyramid content other than “Wizardry Refined.” The idea here is to engage new players and avoid bamboozling them, not to drown them in subsystems and variants.
Is this 100% compatible with all existing GURPS content?
It’s 90-95% compatible, if you want to put a number on it. The Dungeon Fantasy Roleplaying Game and GURPS Fourth Edition are at worst half as far apart as GURPS Fourth Edition and GURPS Third Edition, and probably considerably closer. But the Dungeon Fantasy Roleplaying Game is a standalone game built to bring in new gamers first and serve longtime GURPS fans second, not vice versa.
For the point costs of powers, if the trait exists only as part of a power, it’s explained in full with that power, with its own name and point cost, not unlike the abilities on pp. 136-151 of GURPS Powers; e.g., “Analyze Magic [19]” rather than a fussy Detect variant that refers to a generic Detect ability. There is no ability-tinkering, power-buiilding mini-game built into the Dungeon Fantasy Roleplaying Game.
I cannot emphasize enough how the character-design part of the game just is. Existing fans who want to tinker aren’t going to get extra tinkering power out of it . . . they’ll get some new monsters, an adventure, a bunch of cleaned-up spell descriptions, several variant rules, etc., plus a game that might actually let them recruit new gamers. However, the rules are heavily GURPS-compatible, which means that tinkering in GURPS can be plugged back into the Dungeon Fantasy Roleplaying Game, and that new gamers who learn the Dungeon Fantasy Roleplaying Game can jump into GURPS without significant difficulty.

The Firing Squad welcomes Sean Punch

I had the opportunity to sit down once again with GURPS Line Editor Sean Punch for a 90-minute interview concerning the GURPS Dungeon Fantasy Boxed Set.

The Kickstarter is ongoing – and to back the Kickstarter is to vote for more physically printed GURPS products.

The interview is fairly clear, though Sean and I both talk fast, and there will be some interruptions in the flow.

This is the first Firing Squad video in over a year . . . sorry for making you wait so long!

If you don’t have time for the full 90-minute show (but you should make time for it, because Sean’s an engaging speaker and I mostly just shut up and listen), at least listen to this seven minute long pitch about the DF boxed set, and what’s in it for you, and why it matters to the future of GURPS.

Seven Minute Summary


And for those with more time on your hands, here’s the full video:


Full 90-minute Interview

As always, as soon as I can make it happen, there will be an MP3 file and a transcript available.

Hey, and why not? Here’s the first interview I ever did, and also my first with Sean.


One thing that I’ve seen a few times here and there is surprise that the goal for the project is set so high. One commenter even likened it to exortion – buy our stuff or GURPS will get it’s throat cut, mwa ha ha!

Maybe I would have thought that, too, once. But my recent examination of pricing for just the books for my own kickstarter and RPG project has changed my mind. I actually expect my own Kickstarter to require more than the DF one, because while +Sean Punch has estimated about 250,000 words for the GURPS DF compilation, mine is 400,000 words (roughly 100,000 of which are monsters – the SRD5.1 has a lot of monsters in it, and I’ve not finished culling them out).

Anyway, the final books come in at 408 pages. That’s 612 words per page, smearing it out over every page. As an interesting note, that’s almost exactly the wordcount per page of The Book of Heroes. So I feel like I’m not in crazy town.

But I digress. These things are expensive to put together, because very clearly, SJG is working off of their experience on “how not to get utterly floored by your own Kickstarter.”

They have limited stretch goals, zero commits to “out of the box extras,” and have given the shipping costs to Backerkit to manage as an extra. They have not done the project KS until the writing was done, and maybe the layout too. Art is still being worked.

This is all fantastic news. It drastically limits the risks for the vendor, and that means the risks to the customer are also minimized.

And I’ll say it again, though +Phil Reed has said it frequently and well: International shipping sucks. It’s terrifying and terrifyingly expensive. Sending individual books overseas can easily be multiples of the cost per book. The only way around that is either to to have them printed and distributed from within the target market zone, or to ship pallets of books to try and average out the shipping. Both require perfect knowledge of who’s ordering your product, and are not predictable ahead of time.

But let’s get back to it. In a KS, or any business, you should seek to cover all of your costs – including “sunk” costs like staff writing and editing, because if Sean isn’t writing DF, he’s writing something else. Also, writing and editing are two different jobs, best handled by two different people. There’s a reason I’m going to outsource editing to an industry pro and pay him, in his own words “an adult wage.”

Anyway, let’s do this:

Note: I’m making lots of very specific assumptions here about quality, quantity, and form factor. Can a game be published for less than what my numbers suggest? Sure! But read on, and you’ll see what I’ve done is provide “middle of the road” estimates for things.

  • Writing and editing each range from 3-8 cents per word. Lets book 5 cents each.
  • Indexing is ballparked at $10 per 1,000 words.
  • Art is ballparked at $250 per full-page, but could be much more, for full color. You want 1 piece of art every 2-4 pages. Or at 625 words per page, about 1 piece of art every 1,800 words. Each piece in my experience tends to average about 1/3 page: $80.
  • Layout is harder to find benchmarks for – let’s say a penny per 200 words. That may be wrong.

So for a 250/400K project, you’re looking at 
$25,000 and $40,000 in writing and editing
$2500 or $4000 in indexing
$1250 or $2,000 in layout
$14,000 or $20,000 in artwork – oh, add another flat grand or two for cover art, which is more expensive.

That means that for first order, costs to make a 250,000-word PDF ready to send to a printer is about $43,000, and for my project it might be $66,000. Roughly a dollar for every 6-7 words of the project!

And that’s not including printing costs. But my reading of things is that to cover taxes, Kickstarter fees, and backerkit, plus incidentals that come up during the project, you’d best raise at least 1.5x your projected costs. Maybe double.

Note this gets the smaller project – with no extras, to about $65,000 with no printing costs. Price breaks for this sorta stuff don’t even start until you hit 1,000 books. And this is not one book, but five, and smaller.  But using the PrintNinja estimator, 1000 x 8×10 books at 128 pages, softcover perfect bound are $5 per book, and down to $3 per book if you order 2,000. Less then $2 for 5,000 copies. So let’s go with $10 to print all five books. So $10,000 just to get some scale for the books alone. Then there’s the adventurer screen and dice. No idea there. But based on the price point for the game and PDFs, I’m going to estimate $10-14 as total cost of materials, including the box. So cost of materials, including gross-up for fees and incidentals, will run $30,000-$55,000.

So look – $95K to $120K target for the DF boxed set, “just” to get 2,000 copies made in a fashion that the customers are demanding[1] – high production value, boxed set, all in.

So don’t be surprised by requests for $100-200,000 for getting a game launched in a way that emulates the Big Dogs. If I were to be selling a 304-page hardback with 188,000 words in it, expect costs on the order of $41,000, and a Kickstarter ask of $60-80K per book.

Note I expect long-time industry pros with go-to contacts in the industry – and especially in China – might be able to do better. But my point here is that there’s nothing extortionate about the funding level here, and in fact is likely just the bare requirement to make money on the project. Note how I left off “profit” from the equation? That’s not a valid business  model. So whatever savings a set of experienced pros can do off of my numbers, that goes into “yes, this is a viable investment we should repeat.”

Edited to Add: Now, consider what happens when you add shipping into the mix. Media mail for a single book is the only well-known quantity. If your package is a book that weighs 4lbs or less, you can get anywhere in the USA for $5. If it’s more, you can do some sort of flat-rate box.

Internationally, it’s a total crapshoot, and ranges from $20-90 per package. so let’s take a lower-end but not unrealistic value. $30. For 1,500 backers, you would have to add on another $45,000 x fees and taxes (KS revenue is taxed as income) – probably another $60K, because you don’t want to take a bath on shipping. That turns an average requirement for print-only from about $65 to about $105 pretty fast. If you didn’t account for it, it can take your notional profit, or your salary for writing and editing your own work, to zero pretty fast, and it’s easy to see how a run-away successful kickstarter from the revenue perspective can bankrupt a company.

[1] Buy in for D&D5 is something like over $100 for PHB, DMG, and Monster Manual. The Dracula Dossier and Delta Green Agent’s Handbook are ful-color, high value books. All are going like gangbusters in their market. The market demands high quality books. 


Trust me. Here at Gaming Ballistic, we understand boom. I have up-close, personal experience with boom in GURPS.

And we asked SJG “what about PDF! How can you do this without a PDF?”

And they answered.

Here’s the text of Phil’s announcement in the Kickstarter:

I’ve already increased my pledge to cover the cost of the PDFs. 

Dungeon Fantasy in PDF

As requested, we’re offering the five Dungeon Fantasy Roleplaying Game books in PDF as an add-on to the project.

If you would like the PDFs in addition to the printed box set, please add $35 to your pledge; you’ll tell us exactly which add-ons you’ve selected during the BackerKit survey.

If you only want the five books in PDF, then you may back the project at the “No Reward” level for $1 and then add $35 to your pledge for a total pledge of $36 to receive only these five books in PDF.

If this project closes successfully, then the PDFs will be delivered through Warehouse 23 when the printed box sets ship in 2017.

– Phil Reed

This note from SJG CEO Phil Reed provides guidance on backing the project and supporting GURPS ongoing investment even if the shipping of the physical DF boxed set is too much money.

This entire project – from a fan’s perspective – should be views as a semi-binding straw poll on GURPS’ funding level within SJG. Big success? Well, they’ll do more of these. Fizzle? Sorry, nice knowing you.

NO SJG STAFFER HAS SAID SUCH. But look at Steve Jackson’s statement in my interview with him about how being a private company means he can do what he wants to, not what is necessarily something an MBA would tell you to do.

So: if you can’t afford, or don’t want, the physical DF boxed set, at least consider Pyramid!

Or, in Phil’s word . . .

Posted by Steve Jackson Games (Creator)

Thanks, everyone, for making this such a strong project launch. We appreciate your enthusiasm for the Dungeon Fantasy Roleplaying Game, and your early support means a lot to all of us here at Steve Jackson Games.

We understand the concerns that many of you outside of the United States have about shipping costs, but we’re taking the lessons of the Ogre Designer’s Edition to heart. International shipping, as many will tell you, is brutally expensive, and we must use realistic shipping estimates.

Still, even if you decide not to support the project to receive a copy of the printed game, there are ways to join the project and completely avoid shipping. One of the best ways to participate and dodge pricey international shipping costs is to back the project at the No Reward level and then add-on a one-year subscription to Pyramid. That pledge comes to $71 and scores you one year — twelve issues — of Pyramid and any unlocked bonus PDFs. Backing the project in this way shows your interest in the game — and GURPS overall — and, if we succeed, you’ll have the chance to buy the Dungeon Fantasy Roleplaying Game from your favorite local game store in 2017 after we release the game to distributors.

Regardless of how you choose to support the project — a small pledge, one of the higher reward levels, or posting on blogs and forums — you are making the Dungeon Fantasy Roleplaying Game a reality.

If you have any questions at all, please leave us a comment and one of us will answer as soon as possible.

– Phil Reed

Thursday is GURPSDay. And today is very nearly THE GURPSDay, as we’re probably seeing the biggest GURPS news today since the announcement of Fourth Edition in 2004. Below you can find the blog activity from the last seven days.

Over the last week there have been 55 GURPS-related posts from our list of 63 blogs that have popped up on the radar screen. (We picked up another one: Cole Jenkins’ Of Paper Men and Plastic Monsters.)

So today is the day.  As of roughly 10am, the Dungeon Fantasy RPG Boxed Set Kickstarter has gone live. 

I also suspect that we might see other DF news, since a smaller but game-changing project will go live soon. Maybe not, but we’ll see.

It’s a good day to GURPS.

Not every blog posts about GURPS every week, but some are ridiculously prolific! The list is randomized, so different bloggers will be highlighted at the top of the post each week.

As always, if you’re interested in having your blog consolidated here, navigate over to The Instructions Page and drop me a line.

Chain Link and Concrete (M. Eversberg II)

Gaming Ballistic (Douglas Cole)

  • DF Kickstarter Update #2: PDFs of DF files (9/01/16) – SJG adds the ability to get PDFs of the DF Boxed set to the Kickstarter Add-ons. Asked and answered!
  • DF Kickstarter Update #1: A pretty damn important note (9/01/16) – An important note from Phil Reed in Update #1 from the Kickstarter about international shipping, and how you can back the project anyway, showing a vote of support for GURPS. Please read it, and consider backing.
  • GURPS Day Summary Aug 26 – Sept 1, 2016 (9/01/16)
  • Dungeon Fantasy Boxed Set – Q&A with Phil Reed (8/31/16) – Steve Jackson Games’ CEO Phil Reed answers a few of my questions about the recently-announced GURPS Dungeon Fantasy Boxed Set!
  • Dungeon Fantasy Boxed Set announced! (8/31/16) – Steve Jackson Games makes a big announcement – a Kickstarter for a five-volume boxed Dungeon Fantasy set with lots of goodies in the box. Ready-to-play, with consolidated and edited content that will invite beginners and please grognards. Also – I’ve got interviews scheduled with Phil Reed and Sean Punch on this topic over the next two weeks. Watch this space!
  • Aeon Campaign S3E7 – Ante-mortem (8/30/16) – In S3E7 of the Aeon campaign, we attend the civilian funeral of a fallen hero off-screen. We then try and figure out how to take the fight back to Blue Skies, and decide to really play the anti-Wheaton card. We get them evicted from their own main headquarters. Upon doing that, we realize that we’ve been penetrated at a high level by a group similar to Anonymous called Sentry. That is interrupted in true pulp fashion by a biker gang with machineguns. They are dealt with efficiently, but a bigger threat is revealed.

Of Paper Men and Plastic Monsters (Cole Jenkins)

Cadiz Redemption (Michael Wolf)

Dark Paths and Wandered Roads (Jason Woollard)

  • Sundered Lands 11 (9/01/16) – The newest adventures in the Sundered Lands of Palladium, our GURPS: Palladium Fantasy campaign.
  • Grand Duchy 85 (9/01/16) – The Grey Company does more exploration of the ancient Temple of Pflarr. Remar discovers a new “friend.” Summary of the latest play session of The Grand Duchy of Adventure, our GURPS: Mystara campaign.

Improvised Radio Theatre – With Dice (RogerBW)

Game Geekery (“Warren “”Mook”” Wilson”)

Ravens N’ Pennies (Christopher R. Rice)

Southern Style GURPS (Chris Bower)

The Lands of Nandeme (Charles Saeger)

Dice and Lives (Joel Sammallahti)

  • Sleepless Nights: Magic House Rules (2 of 2) (8/27/16) – More additions to the standard magic system: magic circles, decanic sigils, and using Thaumatology to add temporary enhancements to spells. Plus applications for Alchemy, Autohypnosis, and more!
  • Sleepless Nights: Magic House Rules (1 of 2) (8/26/16) – Additions to the standard magic system: Temporal mana variations rather than spatial ones, reasons to spend more than 1 point on spells, and Ritual Magic as a versatile supporting skill for spells.

Don’t Forget Your Boots (Mitch French)

GURB- The Generic Universal Roleplaying Blog (The_RyujinLP) (Moe Lane)

Let’s GURPS (Pseudonym) (Rindis)

Dungeon Fantastic (Peter Dell’Orto)

Mailanka’s Musings (Daniel Dover)

Dr. Kromm’s GURPS Livejournal (“Sean “”Dr. Kromm”” Punch”)

Just Roll 3d6 (Colin)

  • Dungeon Fantasy Kickstarter Announced (9/02/16)
  • Character Creation Options (8/30/16) – Point buy may be the default way to create GURPS characters, but it’s far from the only option. This post examines several methods for building GURPS characters and explores which mechanism make the most sense for different player and GM needs.

When I heard that there was going to be a big SJG project, and given that I have a certain amount of contact with Sean and the SJG team thanks to being an author for them, as well as doing the fairly well-received GURPSDay compilations, I volunteered to conduct a series of interviews with the SJG team.

+Phil Reed is a busy guy. CEOs are like that, in my experience. While I usually try and do interviews on The Firing Squad, which allows me to dig deeper and probe with follow-ups, that simply wasn’t going to happen.

Phil graciously answered a few questions on the Dungeon Fantasy Boxed Set via email. I’ll be following up in a more content-driven conversation – on video – with Sean next week (though it’ll take a bit to get through my post-production, and then transcription, though the vid will go up before the transcript is ready).

My questions are in bold. His answers are in plain text. Continue reading “Dungeon Fantasy Boxed Set – Q&A with Phil Reed”

Steve Jackson Games has made a major announcement about the Dungeon Fantasy product line.

They will be launching a Kickstarter (tomorrow! September 1) to fund the development of a five-volume boxed set with extra pieces and revised content. Lots of support in the box to help new players get into the game, too.

One of the most intriguing things to me about the cover art? Powered by GURPS.

I always thought PbG was a great idea. I still do. That they’ve brought it back (PbG was a thing for the 3e WW2 sub-line, and a few other projects) gives me some hope for other ideas I have as well. 

There’s more to this post than a repeat of  other news, though. I will be conducting a written interview with Phil Reed on this topic, and welcoming Sean back to the Firing Squad (my video interview section) next Wednesday to discuss the content of the game in detail.

So watch this space! Exciting things are afoot for GURPS. Two hardbacks and a boxed set in one year. Oh, and I’ll say it anyway, because it needs to be said

If you have observed, stated, complained, or otherwise noted that you do wish support for GURPS would increase, you need too back this Kickstarter. This is almost certainly the weather balloon that SJG is sending up to see which way the winds are blowing. And with all the extras in the box, with the five-volume treatment, and Sean spending a LOT of time doing far more than simply compiling already-issued content, the production values will be there.

So back it, review it, play it, share it with your friends. Don’t let it languish or flop. Success breeds future product. Want a GURPS Action boxed set? Steampunk? Monster Hunters? Space Marines/Bug Hunt? Great. Fantasy games are about 20x the market of all other genres combined, in dollar terms. So if you want those others, support this one.

+Mark Langsdorf has an armor design system on his blog that is geared towards Dungeon Fantasy levels of cool. Good armor to match the very high damages that heroes can dish out.

Chatting with +Nathan Joy, who has played and GM’d with both Mark and myself in various games, he noted that it would be nice if Mark’s system produced a bit lower DR for the weight. 

I took a peek at Low-Tech, and that book lists DR 4 “fine mail” – the prototypical and historical value for DR for this type of armor in GURPS – as 15 lbs for just the torso. That means that covering yourself head-to-toe in DR4 mail would be about 46 lbs.

That’s about 11.5 lbs per point of DR, compared to the 6 lbs per point in Mark’s table (which, by the way, is formatted more sensibly as ‘a full suit,’ rather than making a full suit 305% of the armor value in the table as in Low-Tech).

So what if we doubled all the values? That doesn’t quite mesh with some very nice plate armor, though that might depend on how much DR it really had. Some breastplates were 3-4mm thick at the most robust part, and about half that at the thinnest. At DR 2-2.5 per mm for older steels, that’s a DR in the 6-10 range, so we benchmarked it as DR 8 weighing around 60-70 lbs. 8 lbs per point of DR seemed better and a nice value, and that was less than doubling would provide.

It was also a bit more than Mark would have liked (I shared this with him; he wrote BFA, after all), and so I tweaked it out a bit to match his expectations more.

OK, moving on to cost, looking around, again, at plate harness, we found estimates that equated to between six to twelve months pay for a skilled laborer was what harness could cost. We pegged that at between average and comfortable wealth, or, all said and done, about ten grand for a DR 8 full suit.

Then I did math. Not a lot, but I liked Mark’s low estimate of about $50-60 per point of DR for the natural hides and cloths. Again with the jiggering, if I wanted the low figure at roughly $60, and the high at $1,200, that meant a factor of 20 in cost for a factor of about 3 or 3.5 range in pounds per point of DR. Net/net, cost per point of DR should be about $1,035,000 divided by the lbs per DR to the 3.25 power.

That gives the modified table above, which I tweaked out to avoid nasty decimals.

The lighter per point of DR your armor is, the more you pay for it. If you want DF-quality armor at 6 lbs per point of DR . . . it can be had for about $3,000 per point of DR. So a DR 8 harness would cost $24,000 and weigh 48 lbs. 

That’s not crazy talk.

By eye, this table isn’t completely insane, either, compared to Low-Tech. Cloth and Silk would be about 5.3 lbs/DR for torso only, which is in the ballpark. Cost for Textiles at DR 1 torso-only would thus be about $11. DR 4 mail, torso only is 13 lbs (LT has 15) and costs $2,300 (LT has $900). Lightweight but very expensive, befitting something that was pretty darn labor-intensive.

So again, not insane. 

Looking at armor types, the natural ones are all less than $125 per point of DR. The metal ones are more expensive, with scale (small flat plates hammered out, available very early in time) costing less than the more labor-intensive mail, and still less than the finely-crafted full-plate harness.

Parting Shot

The table leverages Mark’s excellent “keep it basically simple” “Better Fantasy Armor” rules and scales it based on some real-world benchmarks (well, as real-world as 400+ year-old data can get) to achieve something that’s at least internally self-consistent. 

It can scale reasonably well, too. And if you want to find the cost for (say) casting Lighten on plate harness for 4 lbs per point of DR? Plug it into the formula, and you get a 32-lb., DR 8 harness at $91,500.

The issue you’ll run smack into here is that the Strength table gets pretty egregious about punching through armor at values that PCs have access to (and should). Lots of proprosed solutions for this, including dropping damage to a fraction of ST, as in my rescaling from very, very early in my blogging career. All of them nerf ST penetration one way or another.

What about different Tech Levels? TL4 to TL8 has a 3.25x difference in monthly pay, and materials and production methods get better. So divide, which means our DR 8 65-lb plate would be about $2,900. That is, again, not insane.

I’m sure there are issues here, but for a quick conversation, I like where it ended up . . . but since you can still swing at ST 17 for 3d with a broadsword, some method of dealing with that issue is recommended.